↓ Skip to main content

Transfusion monitoring: care practice analysis in a public teaching hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transfusion monitoring: care practice analysis in a public teaching hospital
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), January 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1679-45082016ao3555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valesca Nunes dos Reis, Isabella Bertolin Paixão, Ana Carolina Amaral de São José Perrone, Maria Inês Monteiro, Kelli Borges dos Santos

Abstract

Objective To analyze the process of recording transfusion monitoring at a public teaching hospital. Methods A descriptive and retrospective study with a quantitative approach, analyzing the instruments to record transfusion monitoring at a public hospital in a city in the State of Minas Gerais (MG). Data were collected on the correct completion of the instrument, time elapsed from transfusions, records of vital signs, type of blood component more frequently transfused, and hospital unit where transfusion was performed. Results A total of 1,012 records were analyzed, and 53.4% of them had errors in filling in the instruments, 6% of transfusions started after the recommended time, and 9.3% of patients had no vital signs registered. Conclusion Failures were identified in the process of recording transfusion monitoring, and they could result in more adverse events related to the administration of blood components. Planning and implementing strategies to enhance recording and to improve care delivered are challenging.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 22%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 33%