You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revision of the Neotropical genus Triportheus Cope, 1872 (Characiformes: Characidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neotropical Ichthyology, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1679-62252004000400001 |
| Authors |
Maria Claudia S. L. Malabarba |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Professor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,526,944
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#152
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,624
of 167,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#11
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.