You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taxonomic review of Hisonotus Eigenmann & Eigenmann (Siluriformes: Loricariidae: Hypoptopomatinae) from the laguna dos Patos system, southern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neotropical Ichthyology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1679-62252011000100001 |
| Authors |
Tiago Pinto Carvalho, Roberto E Reis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#282
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,906
of 123,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.