↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic revision of thorny catfish genus Hassar (Siluriformes: Doradidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Ichthyology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomic revision of thorny catfish genus Hassar (Siluriformes: Doradidae)
Published in
Neotropical Ichthyology, September 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1679-62252011000300006
Authors

José L. O. Birindelli, Danielle F. Fayal, Wolmar B. Wosiacki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 5%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 77%
Environmental Science 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 1 1%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#782
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,165
of 143,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.