↓ Skip to main content

Diseño y evaluación de un equipo para obtener aire espirado condensado

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diseño y evaluación de un equipo para obtener aire espirado condensado
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, March 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132009000100010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar Florencio Araneda Valenzuela, Maria Paulina Salazar Encina

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#146
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,270
of 107,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.