You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of the plasma CTX for assessing the bone activity of the mandible among osteopenic and osteoporotic patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Oral Research, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1806-83242010000200020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Glacio Avolio, Cynthia Brandão, Marcelo Marcucci, Gilberto Alonso |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#65
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,322
of 104,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.