↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based recommendation on toothpaste use *

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 508)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based recommendation on toothpaste use *
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1806-83242014.50000001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Aparecido Cury, Livia Maria Andaló Tenuta

Abstract

Toothpaste can be used as a vehicle for substances to improve the oral health of individuals and populations. Therefore, it should be recommended based on the best scientific evidence available, and not on the opinion of authorities or specialists. Fluoride is the most important therapeutic substance used in toothpastes, adding to the effect of mechanical toothbrushing on dental caries control. The use of fluoride toothpaste to reduce caries in children and adults is strongly based on evidence, and is dependent on the concentration (minimum of 1000 ppm F) and frequency of fluoride toothpaste use (2'/day or higher). The risk of dental fluorosis due to toothpaste ingestion by children has been overestimated, since there is no evidence that: 1) fluoride toothpaste use should be postponed until the age of 3-4 or older, 2) low-fluoride toothpaste avoids fluorosis and 3) fluorosis has a detrimental effect on the quality of life of individuals exposed to fluoridated water and toothpaste. Among other therapeutic substances used in toothpastes, there is evidence that triclosan/copolymer reduce dental biofilm, gingivitis, periodontitis, calculus and halitosis, and that toothpastes containing stannous fluoride reduce biofilm and gingivitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 15%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Researcher 15 5%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 93 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 100 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,613,172
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#28
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,092
of 321,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them