You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING IS INEFFECTIVE IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322005000600009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Caruso, Silvia DC Denari, Soraia AL Ruiz, Karla G Bernal, Gabriela M Manfrin, Celena Friedrich, Daniel Deheinzelin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#861
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,180
of 169,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.