↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Treatment in Severe Cases of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: An Open Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic Treatment in Severe Cases of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: An Open Trial
Published in
Clinics, March 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322009000300008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Angela Martins Mimura, Silvio Kenji Hirota, Norberto Nobuo Sugaya, José Antonio Sanches, Dante Antonio Migliari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#267
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,976
of 108,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.