You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk of Hypothermia in a New Olympic Event: the 10-km Marathon Swim
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322009000400014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renata R. T. Castro, Fernanda SNS Mendes, Antonio Claudio L. Nobrega |
| Abstract |
There are no available data addressing the potential clinical risks of open-water swimming competitions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 34% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#601
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,363
of 107,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.