You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Evaluation of Oculometric Variables in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, September 2009
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322009000900009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hélio Amante Miot, Leonardo Parr dos Santos Fernandes, Edson Nassib Jorge, Daniel Rosito Pivotto, Célia Regina Nogueira, Gláucia Maria Ferreira da Silva Mazeto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 18% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 59% |
Engineering | 3 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#211
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,368
of 102,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.