You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of early esophageal and gastric cancer - initial experience of a western center
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322010000400005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dalton Marques Chaves, Fauze Maluf Filho, Eduardo G. H. de Moura, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Livia Ronise Garcia Arrais, Fabio Kawaguti, Paulo Sakai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 69% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2010.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#334
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,729
of 106,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.