You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth of very low birth weight infants fed with milk from a human milk bank selected according to the caloric and protein value
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322010000800003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marisa da Matta Aprile, Rubens Feferbaum, Nerli Andreassa, Claudio Leone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#326
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,225
of 105,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.