↓ Skip to main content

Associations of exposure to noise with physiological and psychological outcomes among post-cardiac surgery patients in ICUs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Associations of exposure to noise with physiological and psychological outcomes among post-cardiac surgery patients in ICUs
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010001000011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suh-Meei Hsu, Wen-Je Ko, Wen-Chun Liao, Sheng-Jean Huang, Robert J Chen, Chung-Yi Li, Shiow-Li Hwang

Abstract

This study sought to study the associations of noise with heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived psychological and physiological responses among post-cardiac surgery patients in ICUs. Forty patients participated in this study after recovering from anesthesia. A sound-level meter was placed at bedsides to measure noise level for 42 hours, and patients' heart rate and blood pressure were recorded every 5 minutes. Patients were also interviewed for their perceived psychological/physiological responses. The average noise level was between 59.0 and 60.8 dB(A) at the study site. Annoyance and insomnia were the respective psychological and physiological responses reported most often among the patients. Although noise level, irrespective of measures, was not observed to be significantly associated with the self-assessed psychological and physiological responses, it was significantly associated with both heart rate and blood pressure. Our study demonstrated that the noise in ICUs may adversely affect the heart rate and blood pressure of patients, which warrants the attention of hospital administrators and health care workers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#173
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,799
of 172,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.