↓ Skip to main content

Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain - a comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
650 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain - a comparative study
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010001000015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Renovato França, Thomaz Nogueira Burke, Erica Sato Hanada, Amélia Pasqual Marques

Abstract

To contrast the efficacy of two exercise programs, segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscles, on pain, functional disability, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 640 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 141 22%
Student > Master 95 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 84 13%
Student > Postgraduate 49 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 6%
Other 114 18%
Unknown 130 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 225 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 127 20%
Sports and Recreations 69 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 4%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 52 8%
Unknown 138 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#168
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,522
of 172,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.