You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fequency distribution of HLA DQ2 and DQ8 in celiac patients and first-degree relatives in Recife, northeastern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margarida Maria Castro-Antunes, Sergio Crovella, Lucas André Cavalcanti Brandão, Rafael Lima Guimarães, Maria Eugênia Farias Almeida Motta, Giselia Alves Pontes da Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,521,531
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#163
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,577
of 190,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#10
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.