↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors of a good response to initial therapy in children and adolescents with differentiated thyroid cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic factors of a good response to initial therapy in children and adolescents with differentiated thyroid cancer
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Vaisman, Daniel Alves Bulzico, Cencita Hosannah Cordeiro Noronha Pessoa, Maria Alice Neves Bordallo, Ullyanov Bezerra Toscano de Mendonça, Fernando Luiz Dias, Claudia Medina Coeli, Rossana Corbo, Mario Vaisman

Abstract

Therapeutic approaches in pediatric populations are based on adult data because there is a lack of appropriate data for children. Consequently, there are many controversies regarding the proper treatment of pediatric patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Tunisia 1 5%
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,319
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.