↓ Skip to main content

Atypical mole syndrome and dysplastic nevi: identification of populations at risk for developing melanoma - review article

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atypical mole syndrome and dysplastic nevi: identification of populations at risk for developing melanoma - review article
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Hypólito Silva, Bianca Costa Soares de Sá, Alexandre Leon Ribeiro de Ávila, Gilles Landman, João Pedreira Duprat Neto

Abstract

Atypical Mole Syndrome is the most important phenotypic risk factor for developing cutaneous melanoma, a malignancy that accounts for about 80% of deaths from skin cancer. Because the diagnosis of melanoma at an early stage is of great prognostic relevance, the identification of Atypical Mole Syndrome carriers is essential, as well as the creation of recommended preventative measures that must be taken by these patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,317
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.