↓ Skip to main content

Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis
Published in
Clinics, June 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula Ribeiro, Francis Trombini-Souza, Vitor Tessutti, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Isabel de Camargo Neves Sacco, Sílvia Maria Amado João

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Sports and Recreations 27 15%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#627
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,414
of 122,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.