↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of somatosensory tinnitus: review article

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,225)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
66 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and management of somatosensory tinnitus: review article
Published in
Clinics, June 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanit Ganz Sanchez, Carina Bezerra Rocha

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of an acoustic external stimulus. It affects 10-17% of the world's population and it a complex symptom with multiple causes, which is influenced by pathways other than the auditory one. Recently, it has been observed that tinnitus may be provoked or modulated by stimulation arising from the somatosensorial system, as well as from the somatomotor and visual-motor systems. This specific subgroup -somatosensory tinnitus - is present in 65% of cases, even though it tends to be underdiagnosed. As a consequence, it is necessary to establish evaluation protocols and specific treatments focusing on both the auditory pathway and the musculoskeletal system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 14 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#675,207
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#23
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,357
of 122,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.