↓ Skip to main content

Diabetic foot screening: study of a 3000 times cheaper instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetic foot screening: study of a 3000 times cheaper instrument
Published in
Clinics, June 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Candida Ribeiro Parisi, Daniel Giannella, Tulio Diniz Fernandes, Karla Freire Rezende, Marcia Nery

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 8%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,985
of 122,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.