You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A new method for the assessment of patient safety competencies during a medical school clerkship using an objective structured clinical examination
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renata Mahfuz Daud-Gallotti, Christian Valle Morinaga, Marcelo Arlindo-Rodrigues, Irineu Tadeu Velasco, Milton Arruda Martins, Iolanda Calvo Tiberio |
Abstract |
Patient safety is seldom assessed using objective evaluations during undergraduate medical education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 28% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#667
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,078
of 127,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.