You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative study of pelvic floor muscle training in women with multiple sclerosis: its impact on lower urinary tract symptoms and quality of life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322011000900010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adélia Correia Lúcio, Maria Carolina Perissinoto, Ricardo Aydar Natalin, Alessandro Prudente, Benito Pereira Damasceno, Carlos Arturo Levi D'ancona |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,327,810
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#201
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,323
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.