↓ Skip to main content

PROP1 and CTNNB1 expression in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas with or without β-catenin mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PROP1 and CTNNB1 expression in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas with or without β-catenin mutations
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011001100001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina M.G. Cani, Hamilton Matushita, Luciani R.S. Carvalho, Ibere C. Soares, Luciana P. Brito, Madson Q. Almeida, Berenice B. Mendonça

Abstract

Activating mutations in exon 3 of the β-catenin gene are involved in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Recently, the interaction between β-catenin and PROP1 has been shown to be responsible for pituitary cell lineage determination. We hypothesized that dysregulated PROP1 expression could also be involved in the pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,001
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,585
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#68
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.