↓ Skip to main content

Autologous stem cell transplantation improves quality of life in economically challenged, Brazilian multiple myeloma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous stem cell transplantation improves quality of life in economically challenged, Brazilian multiple myeloma patients
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011001100002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leina Y. Etto, Vânia Maris Morelli, Vanderleia C. Silva, Vania T.M. Hungria, Rozana M. Ciconelli, Manuella S.S. Almeida, José Salvador R. de Oliveira, José Carlos Barros, Brian G. Durie, Gisele W.B. Colleoni

Abstract

1) To characterize the impact of multiple myeloma on the quality of life of patients treated in two public institutions in São Paulo State, Brazil, using a generic Short Form 36 Health Survey and a questionnaire specific for oncologic patients (QLQ-C30) upon diagnosis, after the clinical treatment, and at day +100 after autologous stem cell transplantation; 2) to evaluate whether autologous stem cell transplantation can improve the quality of life of our economically challenged population aside from providing a clinical benefit and disease control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#861
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,829
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#60
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.