↓ Skip to main content

The validity and reliability of the Portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validity and reliability of the Portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011001100011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitri Gusmao-Flores, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Cristiane Ritter, Cristiane Damiani Tomasi, Marco Antônio Sales Dantas de Lima, Lauro Reis Santana, Rita Márcia Pacheco Lins, Patrícia Pimenta Lemos, Gisele Vasconcelos Serpa, Jenisson Oliveira, Ricardo Ávila Chalhub, Melissa Tassano Pitrowsky, Acioly L.T. Lacerda, Karestan C. Koenen, Lucas C. Quarantini

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 72.4%. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 4%
United States 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 24%