↓ Skip to main content

Cenário da publicação científica dos últimos 5 anos sobre cuidados paliativos em oncologia: revisão de escopo*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cenário da publicação científica dos últimos 5 anos sobre cuidados paliativos em oncologia: revisão de escopo*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/s1980-220x2017009103336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keron dos Santos Sanches, Eliane Goldberg Rabin, Patrícia Tatiani de Oliveira Teixeira

Abstract

To identify the profile of studies published on palliative care in oncology and to analyze their levels of evidence. A scoping review. Inclusion criteria published in the last 5 years, in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Exclusion criteria incomplete articles, paid for, or those without results. The search resulted in 42,650 publications, where 341 remained after four selection steps. The largest number of publications was in 2015, with 32.55% of the total; 83% were classified as Recommendation Grade B, and 52% with Level of Evidence 2B. Uniprofessional production was more frequent with 67.74% of the publications; physicians were the authors in 93.26%, and nurses in 25.22% of the total articles. There are several articles on the subject, however they have low scientific evidence. Most of the production is uniprofessional, and nurses are the main authors of multiprofessional publications. A brief overview of the scientific publication on palliative care in oncology was performed, from which we can recommend integration among professionals for producing multiprofessional studies with better quality of scientific evidence to direct and improve healthcare.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#267
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,559
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.