You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnósticos de Enfermagem de mães encarceradas*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017024503338 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruanny Maria Albuquerque dos Santos, Francisca Márcia Pereira Linhares, Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais, Tatiane Gomes Guedes, Marcelle Lima Guimarães |
| Abstract |
To identify the Nursing Diagnoses of incarcerated nursing mothers by the NANDA-I Taxonomy II. Descriptive/exploratory study developed in the Women's Penal Colony, Recife, PE. The sample consisted of 18 women who were breastfeeding during the study period. A total of 17 diagnoses were listed, whose accuracy was classified as moderate and high by the Nursing Diagnoses Accuracy Scale (EADE, version 2). Five of these diagnoses were selected for discussion, regarding frequency, magnitude, and impact on the health and well-being of nursing mothers participating in the study. The Nursing Diagnoses identified in this study are not exclusive to nursing mothers who are incarcerated. Some factors relevant to the prison environment may aggravate their problems, which reveal situations of health vulnerability and rights violation. These situations require changes that may respond to the health needs of this target population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#567
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,505
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.