You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology with PET
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1002003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas Porcello Schilling, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Monica Shin, Antoine Leuzy, Tharick A. Pascoal, Andréa L. Benedet, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, André Palmini, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa-Neto |
| Abstract |
Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been reconceptualised as a dynamic pathophysiological process characterized by preclinical, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia stages. Positron emission tomography (PET) associated with various molecular imaging agents reveals numerous aspects of dementia pathophysiology, such as brain amyloidosis, tau accumulation, neuroreceptor changes, metabolism abnormalities and neuroinflammation in dementia patients. In the context of a growing shift toward presymptomatic early diagnosis and disease-modifying interventions, PET molecular imaging agents provide an unprecedented means of quantifying the AD pathophysiological process, monitoring disease progression, ascertaining whether therapies engage their respective brain molecular targets, as well as quantifying pharmacological responses. In the present study, we highlight the most important contributions of PET in describing brain molecular abnormalities in AD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 24 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,330,308
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#32
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,550
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.