↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant transcranial direct current stimulation for treating Alzheimer's disease: A case study

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant transcranial direct current stimulation for treating Alzheimer's disease: A case study
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1002013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suellen Marinho Andrade, Camila Teresa Ponce Leon de Mendonça, Thobias Cavalcanti Laurindo Pereira, Bernardino Fernandez-Calvo, Regina Coely Neves Araújo, Nelson Torro Alves

Abstract

We report the case of a 73-year-old male patient with Alzheimer's disease who underwent 10-daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions. tDCS was applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an adjuvant to the traditional treatment that the patient was receiving, which consisted of anticholinergic medication and cognitive training. The data were qualitatively analyzed and are presented in an analytic and structured form. The effects on cognitive performance were evaluated using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were assessed with a set of tests consisting of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Blessed Dementia Scale and the Disability Assessment for Dementia. The data obtained revealed that the application of tDCS had a stabilizing effect on overall patient cognitive function and led to improved performance on all the secondary outcome tests. These preliminary results indicate that tDCS is a potential adjuvant therapeutic tool for cognitive rehabilitation in Alzheimer's disease .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 26%
Psychology 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#300
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,819
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.