↓ Skip to main content

Neuropsychological alterations in mercury intoxication persist several years after exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuropsychological alterations in mercury intoxication persist several years after exposure
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1980-57642009dn20200003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Cristina Zachi, Anita Taub, Marcília de Araújo Medrado Faria, Dora Fix Ventura

Abstract

Elemental mercury is a liquid toxic metal widely used in industry. Occupational exposure occurs mainly via inhalation. Previously, neuropsychological assessment detected deficits in former workers of a fluorescent lamp plant who had been exposed to elemental mercury vapor and were away from exposure for several years at the time of examination. The purpose of this work was to reexamine these functions after 18 months in order to evaluate their progression. Thirteen participants completed tests of attention, inhibitory control, verbal/visual memory, psychomotor speed, verbal fluency, visuomotor ability, executive function, semantic knowledge, and depression and anxiety inventories on 2 separate occasions. At baseline, the former workers indicated slower psychomotor and information processing speed, verbal spontaneous recall memory impairment, and increased depression and anxiety symptoms compared to controls (P<0.05). Paired comparisons of neuropsychological functioning within the exposed group at baseline and 1.5 years later showed poorer immediate memory performance (P<0.05). There were no differences on other measures. Although the literature show signs of recovery of functions, the neuropsychological effects related to mercury exposure are found to persist for many years.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#300
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,776
of 168,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.