↓ Skip to main content

Memory span measured by the spatial span tests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery in a group of Brazilian children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Memory span measured by the spatial span tests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery in a group of Brazilian children and adolescents
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05020012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosani Aparecida Antunes Teixeira, Elaine Cristina Zachi, Daniela Tsubota Roque, Anita Taub, Dora Fix Ventura

Abstract

The neuropsychological tests of spatial span are designed to measure attention and working memory. The version of the spatial span test in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) evaluates these functions through the recall of sequences of spatial locations presented to the subject. The present study investigated how age, gender and educational level might affect the performance of the non-verbal system. A total of 60 children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years were assessed (25 males and 35 females). The results showed no gender differences in test performance. Children with six or more years of education showed better performance than children with less than three years of education. Older children had more schooling and thus were able to recall a greater number of items. Span length values proved similar to a previous large normative study which also employed the CANTAB Spatial Span (De Luca et al., 2003). The similarity in performance of the Brazilian children and adolescents studied and the group of Australian participants examined by the cited authors, despite the socio-cultural and economical differences, points to the suitability of the task for the assessment of attention and working memory in Brazilian children.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#207
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,531
of 190,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.