↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of word number and content in discourse of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of word number and content in discourse of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1980-57642014dn83000010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Onofre de Lira, Thaís Soares Cianciarullo Minett, Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci, Karin Zazo Ortiz

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by impairments in memory and other cognitive functions such as language, which can be affected in all aspects including discourse. A picture description task is considered an effective way of obtaining a discourse sample whose key feature is the ability to retrieve appropriate lexical items. There is no consensus on findings showing that performance in content processing of spoken discourse deteriorates from the mildest phase of AD. To compare the quantity and quality of discourse among patients with mild to moderate AD and controls. A cross-sectional study was designed. Subjects aged 50 years and older of both sexes, with one year or more of education, were divided into three groups: control (CG), mild AD (ADG1) and moderate AD (ADG2). Participants were asked to describe the "cookie theft" picture. The total number of complete words spoken and information units (IU) were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference among groups in terms of age, schooling and sex. For number of words spoken, the CG performed significantly better than both the ADG 1 and ADG2, but no difference between the two latter groups was found. CG produced almost twice as many information units as the ADG1 and more than double that of the ADG2. Moreover, ADG2 patients had worse performance on IUs compared to the ADG1. Decreased performance in quantity and content of discourse was evident in patients with AD from the mildest phase, but only content (IU) continued to worsen with disease progression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 15%
Linguistics 7 13%
Psychology 6 12%
Computer Science 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 11 21%