You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Da classificação de obras lexicográficas e seus problemas: proposta de uma taxonomia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alfa: Revista de Lingüística, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1981-57942014000100009 |
| Authors |
Félix Bugueño Miranda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 6 | 75% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Alfa: Revista de Lingüística
#6
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,267
of 238,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alfa: Revista de Lingüística
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.