You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
UTILIZAÇÃO DE ALVOS CODIFICADOS DO TIPO ARUCO NA AUTOMAÇÃO DO PROCESSO DE CALIBRAÇÃO DE CÂMARAS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1982-21702014000300036 |
| Authors |
Sérgio Leandro Alves da Silva, Antonio Maria Garcia Tommaselli, Almir Olivette Artero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
#2
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,110
of 248,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them