You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ctenocephalides felis felis vs. Ctenocephalides canis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae): some issues in correctly identify these species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1984-29612012000400002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pedro Marcos Linardi, Juliana Lúcia Costa Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 21% |
Unknown | 34 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 35 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 36 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,239,729
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#8
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,412
of 288,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them