↓ Skip to main content

Overview of anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overview of anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants in Brazil
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1984-29612016008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordana Andrioli Salgado, Clóvis de Paula Santos

Abstract

Frequent and inappropriate use of all classes of antiparasitic drugs in small ruminants has led to failures in their effectiveness, culminating in a global problem of anthelmintic resistance. Brazil stands out as one of the world's leaders in publications about anthelmintic resistance, and for having the most numerous reports of this resistance in small ruminants in the Americas. These studies have involved mainly the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and its correlation with field management practices. In vivoeffectiveness testing is conducted in areas where livestock is of greater economic significance, e.g., in the South (sheep) and Northeast (goats), or is important for research and economic centers, such as the Southeast (sheep). The most widely studied species is sheep, for which the widest range of drugs is also evaluated. Despite significant advances achieved in molecular research, laboratory analyses should include knowledge about the reality in the field so that they can become feasible for the producer. Moreover, molecular studies can be underpinned by the analysis of field studies, such as the maintenance of antiparasitic effectiveness over time and the mechanisms involved in this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 20 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#128
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,730
of 314,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.