↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of conventional and molecular techniques for Trypanosoma vivax diagnosis in experimentally infected cattle

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of conventional and molecular techniques for Trypanosoma vivax diagnosis in experimentally infected cattle
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, April 2019
DOI 10.1590/s1984-29612019034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Otavio Luiz Fidelis, Paulo Henrique Sampaio, Luiz Ricardo Gonçalves, Marcos Rogério André, Rosangela Zacarias Machado, Gene Wijffels, Fabiano Antonio Cadioli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#432
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,222
of 364,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.