You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glycodendrimers: versatile tools for nanotechnology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1984-82502013000700008 |
| Authors |
René Roy, Tze Chieh Shiao, Kate Rittenhouse-Olson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 20 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#34
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,904
of 213,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.