You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theoretically nanoscale study on ionization of muscimol nano drug in aqueous solution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1984-82502015000100021 |
| Authors |
Farhoush Kiani, Mehran Abbaszadeh, Mohammad Pousti, Fardad Koohyar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#126
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,222
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.