You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Formulation and evaluation of topical herbal gel for the treatment of arthritis in animal model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1984-82502016000300015 |
| Authors |
Rajasekaran Aiyalu, Arulkumaran Govindarjan, Arivukkarasu Ramasamy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 158 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 89 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 161 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,563,555
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#15
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,037
of 401,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.