↓ Skip to main content

Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, May 2015
DOI 10.1590/so100-720320150005272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofia Raposo Dinis, Ana Patrícia Domingues, Adriana Belo, Daniela Couto, Etelvina Fonseca, Paulo Moura

Abstract

To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Unspecified 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%