↓ Skip to main content

Nanotechnology in Dermatology*

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanotechnology in Dermatology*
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142228
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Roberto Antonio, Carlos Roberto Antônio, Izabela Lídia Soares Cardeal, Julia Maria Avelino Ballavenuto, João Rodrigo Oliveira

Abstract

The scientific community and general public have been exposed to a series of achievements attributed to a new area of knowledge: Nanotechnology. Both abroad and in Brazil, funding agencies have launched programs aimed at encouraging this type of research. Indeed, for many who come into contact with this subject it will be clear the key role that chemical knowledge will play in the evolution of this subject. And even more, will see that it is a science in which the basic structure is formed by distilling different areas of inter-and multidisciplinary knowledge along the lines of new paradigms. In this article, we attempt to clarify the foundations of nanotechnology, and demonstrate their contribution to new advances in dermatology as well as medicine in general. Nanotechnology is clearly the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 64 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Chemistry 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 73 38%