↓ Skip to main content

Manual Ability Classification System (MACS): reliability between therapists and parents in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS): reliability between therapists and parents in Brazil
Published in
Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., February 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela B R Silva, Carolina A R Funayama, Luzia I Pfeifer

Abstract

The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) has been widely used to describe the manual ability of children with cerebral palsy (CP); however its reliability has not been verified in Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 35 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#678
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,538
of 361,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.