↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of different methodologies of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of different methodologies of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle
Published in
Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., April 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almir V Dibai-Filho, Elaine C O Guirro, Vânia T K Ferreira, Hugo E Brandino, Maíta M O L L Vaz, Rinaldo R J Guirro

Abstract

Infrared thermography is recognized as a viable method for evaluation of subjects with myofascial pain. The aim of the present study was to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of infrared image analysis of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. A reliability study was conducted with 24 volunteers of both genders (23 females) between 18 and 30 years of age (22.12±2.54), all having cervical pain and presence of active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. Two trained examiners performed analysis of point, line, and area of the infrared images at two different periods with a 1-week interval. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability. With regard to the intra-rater reliability, ICC values were between 0.591 and 0.993, with temperatures between 0.13 and 1.57 °C for values of standard error of measurement (SEM) and between 0.36 and 4.35 °C for the minimal detectable change (MDC). For the inter-rater reliability, ICC ranged from 0.615 to 0.918, with temperatures between 0.43 and 1.22 °C for the SEM and between 1.19 and 3.38 °C for the MDC. The methods of infrared image analyses of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle employed in the present study are suitable for clinical and research practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 39 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,039,501
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#117
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,628
of 279,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them