↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of the six-minute walk test and Glittre ADL-test in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility of the six-minute walk test and Glittre ADL-test in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung disease
Published in
Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., June 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anderson José, Simone Dal Corso

Abstract

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Glittre ADL-test (GT) are used to assess functional capacity and exercise tolerance; however, the reproducibility of these tests needs further study in patients with acute lung diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the 6MWT and GT performed in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung diseases. 48 h after hospitalization, 81 patients (50 males, age: 52±18 years, FEV1: 58±20% of the predicted value) performed two 6MWTs and two GTs in random order on different days. There was no difference between the first and second 6MWT (median 349 m [284-419] and 363 m [288-432], respectively) (ICC: 0.97; P<0.0001). A difference between the first and second tests was found in GT (median 286 s [220-378] and 244 s [197-323] respectively; P<0.001) (ICC: 0.91; P<0.0001). Although both the 6MWT and GT were reproducible, the best results occurred in the second test, demonstrating a learning effect. These results indicate that at least two tests are necessary to obtain reliable assessments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 27%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 29 36%