↓ Skip to main content

Improving performance in golf: current research and implications from a clinical perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving performance in golf: current research and implications from a clinical perspective
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerrie Evans, Neil Tuttle

Abstract

Golf, a global sport enjoyed by people of all ages and abilities, involves relatively long periods of low intensity exercise interspersed with short bursts of high intensity activity. To meet the physical demands of full swing shots and the mental and physical demands of putting and walking the course, it is frequently recommended that golfers undertake golf-specific exercise programs. Biomechanics, motor learning, and motor control research has increased the understanding of the physical requirements of the game, and using this knowledge, exercise programs aimed at improving golf performance have been developed. However, while it is generally accepted that an exercise program can improve a golfer's physical measurements and some golf performance variables, translating the findings from research into clinical practice to optimise an individual golfer's performance remains challenging. This paper discusses how biomechanical and motor control research has informed current practice and discusses how emerging sophisticated tools and research designs may better assist golfers improve their performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 25%
Student > Bachelor 33 19%
Lecturer 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 62 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Engineering 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,456,040
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#3
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,219
of 287,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.