↓ Skip to main content

TOFACITINIB IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS REFRACTORY TO ANTI-TNF AND ANTI-INTEGRIN THERAPIES

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TOFACITINIB IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS REFRACTORY TO ANTI-TNF AND ANTI-INTEGRIN THERAPIES
Published in
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/s0004-2803.201800000-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Vieira Teixeira, Adérson Omar Mourão Cintra Damião, Paulo Gustavo Kotze

Abstract

Janus kinases inhibitors have already been incorporated into the management of immune-mediated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and are being investigated for the treatment of psoriasis and inflammatory bowel diseases, both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Tofacitinib is an oral small-molecule drug that inhibits Janus kinases 1, Janus kinases 3, and, to a lesser extent, Janus kinases 2. This inhibition ends up blocking signals for several inflammatory cytokines that are involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and play a role in many immune signaling routes, including lymphocyte activation, function, and proliferation. We report a patient with active ulcerative colitis with primary non-response to three biologics (infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab), with different mechanisms of action, who refused surgical treatment and had a favorable response to tofacitinib with clinical and endoscopic remission. No adverse events were observed with the use of the agent. This case illustrates the difficulties we may face regarding the identification of the expression of proper mechanism of action involved in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis patients and the importance of having another treatment option with different mechanism of action, like tofacitinib.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Computer Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 38 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#115
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,445
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them