You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
INAPPROPRIATE USAGE OF INTRAVENOUS PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN A HIGH COMPLEXITY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-07 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura M Bischoff, Laura S M Faraco, Lucas V Machado, Alex V S Bialecki, Gabriel M de Almeida, Smile C C Becker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#55
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,873
of 451,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them