↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a new kind of surgical simulator. The physical surgical simulator 1

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of a new kind of surgical simulator. The physical surgical simulator 1
Published in
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020180010000009
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz, André Filipe Miranda, Lucas Evangelista da Costa, Rafael Ulysses de Azevedo, Sabrina Thalita dos Reis, Miguel Srougi, Carlo Camargo Passerotti

Abstract

To evaluate whether the use of the physical surgical simulator may benefit the development of laparoscopic skills. Ten medical students were divided into two groups: the first one performed ten weekly training sessions with a physical surgical simulator - ETX A2 LAP and, afterwards, one laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a porcine model, while the second group performed only a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both groups were compared regarding bleeding, total surgical time, time to perform each surgical step and qualitative parameters, based on a previously validated tool. There was no difference in any of the evaluated parameters. We did not find any evidence of benefit in the use of the physical simulator for surgical performance in medical students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Engineering 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 36%